Seyfarth Synopsis: In Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a plaintiff must have a concrete injury to sue for FCRA violations. Following Spokeo’s remand, courts have held that consumers have standing to sue if their reports are inaccurate even if an inaccuracy did not adversely affect them.
What Employers Need To Know About Supreme Court Issues After The Passing Of Justice Scalia
By Gerald L. Maatman, Jr., Christina M. Janice, Michael W. Stevens, and Kylie R. Byron
Make no mistake, the role of Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court profoundly impacts the balance of power among the branches of our government. Now, with the untimely passing of Justice Antonin Scalia on February 13, the void created in the balance
Continue Reading What Employers Need To Know About Supreme Court Issues After The Passing Of Justice Scalia
ELL SCOTUS SERIES: # 2 – Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins
In the second periodic installment of the Employment Law Lookout Blog Team’s analysis of employment law (and related) case being heard by the United States Supreme Court this term, read on for our take on Spokeo Inv. v. Robins.
Plaintiffs Without Injuries? SCOTUS To Hear Arguments Whether
Plaintiffs Need to Show Concrete Harm To Establish
Injury-in-Fact for Article III Standing
Continue Reading ELL SCOTUS SERIES: # 2 – Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins