By Paul Galligan and Meredith-Anne Berger
Seyfarth Synopsis: The Third Circuit has shaken up long-standing precedent and created a split among the circuits, such that now employers should not only evaluate its employment decisions for the effect on individuals over forty and under forty, but within subgroups of those over forty as well.
Last week, in Karlo v.
Continue Reading Third Circuit Plays the “Top Fifty” Hits, Allows ADEA Claim for Employees Fifty and Over