Hiring, Testing & Selection

By Sara Eber Fowler and Johanna T. Wise

Last week, an en banc panel of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals took a fresh look at whether Ford Motor Company’s decision to deny an employee’s request to telecommute four days a week violated the ADA. Reversing its prior ruling from last year (previously reported here), the 8-5 panel in
Continue Reading So Is Telecommuting A Reasonable Accommodation? Not So Fast Says The Sixth Circuit, Reversing Course.

By: Paul Kehoe and Pamela Q. Devata

On May 15, 2014, Baltimore joined the growing number of jurisdictions to ban the box on employment applications.  Mayor Stephanie Rawlings Blake signed Baltimore’s Fair Criminal-Record Screening Practices ordinance, which bans private employers from inquiring about or conducting a criminal background check on an applicant until after an employer has essentially completed the
Continue Reading Imprisonment For Asking About Criminal Convictions Too Early? Baltimore Bans the Box.

By: Mark A. Lies II and James C. Goodfellow, Jr.

Effective January 1, 2014, Illinois became the 20th state to legalize medical marijuana.  The passage of this law has created concerns for employers, which we outline below.

The Illinois Compassionate use of Medical Cannabis Pilot Program Act (the “Act”), enacted just that: a pilot program that is scheduled to be
Continue Reading Reefer Madness Redux? What To Do Now That Illinois Has Legalized Medical Marijuana?

By Pamela Quigley Devata, Paul Kehoe, and Craig B. Simonsen

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) have just announced two short guides on employment background checks: Background Checks: What Employers Need to Know and Background Checks: What Job Applicants and Employees Should Know.  The documents were not subject to Commissioner review
Continue Reading FTC and EEOC Publish Guide for Employers on Background Checks in Hiring

By Condon McGlothlen

Together with labor economists and political pundits, employment counsel and HR professionals keep wondering if and when U.S. hiring figures will rebound.  The economy as a whole seemed to have turned a corner as 2014 got underway – new jobs figures had been strong for months, unemployment was declining steadily.  The Federal Reserve, accordingly, announced that its
Continue Reading Hiring Risks and Rewards for 2014

By Kimberly Altschul Straker and Gena Usenheimer

For employers evaluating applicants, one crucial factor can be relevant job experience. But employers should be wary about disqualifying applicants based on the fact that they may not be currently employed. Several states and cities have adopted legislation aimed at helping unemployed workers secure employment. Around the country, local restrictions have been placed on the ability of employers to refuse to consider or hire people because they are unemployed. At least 5 states and cities have passed laws in the last few years prohibiting discrimination against unemployed job applicants, including Madison, Wisconsin, New York City, the District of Columbia as well as New Jersey and Oregon. For our earlier alerts on the New Jersey and New York laws, click HERE  and HERE

Most recently, a bill has been introduced in Congress entitled the “Fair Employment Opportunity Act of 2014” which aims to prohibit discrimination on the basis of an individual’s status or history of unemployment, except where a requirement related to employment status is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to successful performance in the job.
Continue Reading Unemployed Need Not Apply?

By Megan Poonolly 

Employment discrimination laws are designed to ensure equal employment opportunity for all individuals by prohibiting discrimination on a variety of bases and requiring companies to accommodate qualified disabilities and religious beliefs. But what happens when those very protections and accommodations for one protected trait appear to justify or mandate discrimination against a different protected class? Consider this
Continue Reading Let’s Not Shake On It: Getting a Grip on Faith-Based Refusals to Shake Hands with Opposite-Sex Co-Workers

By Clark Smith

Back in September, we blogged about the EEOC’s recent enforcement of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act.  GINA prohibits employers from requesting genetic information from applicants or employees, and from making employment decisions based on the genetic information.  In May 2013, the Commission settled its first GINA‑based action against a Tulsa fabric manufacturer, Fabricut, Inc.  Last month, the
Continue Reading Recent Settlement Highlights EEOC’s Commitment to Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act Enforcement

By Sara Eber

Great, you think, I selected a great candidate for the job – now she just has to fill out some paperwork, take a routine drug test, and she’ll be ready to start.

Your new hire reports for her test and receives a cup for her urine sample.  She seems anxious and takes a long time in the
Continue Reading You’re In…If You’ve Got Urine. What To Look Out For Before Telling A New Hire, “You Gotta Go.”

By: Sara Eber

Following a term with many employment-related decisions—and with outcomes emphatically pro-employer—the United States Supreme Court will hear the first oral arguments of its 2013-2014 term, which are currently scheduled to begin on October 7, 2013. 

The docket will again feature several cases with significant implications for employers, including issues affecting the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, the
Continue Reading Continuing the Pro-Employer Trend? What to Watch In the Supreme Court’s 2013/2014 Term